I’m furious! It’s taken me several days to calm down enough to write a blog post that would not see me thrown out of the party, or at the very least lose a number of friends. But here I am, back on the issue of ‘graduate contributions’, the new, wonderful euphemism for student fees.
My background is that I believe that a first degree should be funded out of general taxation. That way those who benefit from increased earnings due to their degree pay more, and businesses and society in general pay a little too for the benefit of having a skilled and educated society. Along with a large number of others in the party, I fought for FPC to adopt that position and then for it to form a part of the manifesto for the 2010 general election. What I did not fight for was for all our MPs and most of our candidates to sign the NUS pledge to oppose an increase in student fees. But sign it they did, and I was pretty pleased that they did so.
That pledge signature is the reason I am so furious. I am not stupid. I realise the Liberal Democrats are not the majority in government. I understand that we need to compromise and am pleased that we have got some of our policies into government and have deflected some of the worst excesses of the Conservatives. I know that Liam Byrne was speaking the truth when he wrote that now infamous note: there is no money left. So we compromise on our manifestos. That’s the way it goes in coalitions – which is certainly what the Liberal Democrats were hoping and campaigning for and what we would see more of under AV or any other changed form of voting. But our MPs didn’t just stand on the corporate manifesto. They garnished it with personal pledges and now they should stick to them.
I had kept my fury under control until this article from Jo Swinson was published on Lib Dem Voice. Jo is an MP that I had a great deal of respect for. She has always spoken up for young people and I would have been surprised if she had not signed the NUS pledge. Her stated reasons for now going back on her word are almost laughable: bringing out the old ‘we can’t get everything we want’ speech and then stating that Browne compromise is really progressive. It’s not as progressive as abolishing fees and putting the cost on income tax, And if you really meant that the pledge was only a pledge when in opposition Jo, either you shouldn’t have signed it. or you shouldn’t have accepted the position of Vince’s PPS.
Yes, not only is Jo the unpaid assistant of the architect of the student betrayal, but of course she is a Scottish MP, representing a Scottish constituency. Her young people will not be burdened with an extra 9% tax, sorry ‘contribution’ at the time they are trying to save a deposit, but a home, start a family etc. Oh no. Only a month ago, the Scottish Liberal Democrats, of which Jo is Deputy Leader, debated the issue of graduate contributions and decided not to increase the amounts paid. So why does Jo state that “without a way to replace this funding, our universities and students would suffer. Mass university closures, slashing of student numbers, severe reduction in teaching quality“? Why will this not be the case for universities in Scotland, who will not be charging huge fees to their home-grown students?
But strangely, my real concern stems from a statement made by Jo and other Lib Dem MPs backing the Browne stuff that “Abolishing tuition fees remains Liberal Democrat policy“. Suppose in 2015 the Liberal Democrats and the economy are in such a position that we can look at abolishing fees. What happens to those who have started at university in the meantime? Here I declare an interest. Our daughter is in the first year of her GCSE studies. With some hard work, she hopes to start university in 2014. Will she be one of a five year cohort of students who will be paying 9% more tax than their older and younger peers for most of their working lives? This has not been thought through properly – or is it just a meaningless sop to the party faithful? Can some of our MPs not just dome clean and admit that they have managed to outfox the membership and secure the policy on student finance that they really wanted?
I am sorry that my injured foot means that I am unable to walk more than a couple of hundred yards at the moment, as I would love to march with past, present and future students to express my disgust at this coalition policy and my support for those Lib Dem MPs prepared to ‘Just say No’. We need more of them with the courage of their convictions.
08 November 2010, 12:46 pm
I’m with you on this – graduate tax, tuition fees – a degree should be free. It was for me.
08 November 2010, 1:18 pm
I quite agree. One of the reasons I first voted Liberal Democrat and why I joined the party was that I am a passionate believer that education should be free.
It was one of the reasons I got involved with the open letter that you signed (copy as sent to Vince Cable at http://chrismills.me.uk/2010/11/tuition-fees-an-open-letter-from-the-liberal-democrat-grassroots/) that went to all Lib Dem MPs.
08 November 2010, 1:21 pm
Totally agree. An education should be free, and a personal promise should not be broken. Lib Dem MPs should rebel.
08 November 2010, 2:16 pm
This blog is spot on, and certainly reflects my views on this situation almost completely.
This isn’t just about fees, it’s about what seems to be becoming a kind of internal struggle within the party. Certainly from what we’ve seen on Twitter (where there have been some very nasty arguments between traditional OB ‘Liberals’ and those of us on the ‘left’ of the party), the issue of MPs voting against party policy in government is not going to go away. If the party leadership don’t sit up and take notice of the dissatisfaction of the membership then we could be in for a very rough few years.
On the issue of tuition fees, the answer is simple. Our MPs didn’t just sign a pledge to vote against a rise in fees, party policy is very clear (and has been re-stated dozens of times since the election), we believe in abolishing fees, and put forward a costed, six year plan to do just this.
I’m shocked by the hypocrisy of Jo Swinson, a former Liberal Youth officer, when she says that we have to compromise. The Scottish Lib Dems didn’t compromise when they forced Labour to drop plans for fees in Scotland, and the Parliamentary Party should not be ‘compromising’ now.
08 November 2010, 3:26 pm
I’ve not read Jo Swinson’s article yet, but the one that did for me was John Hemming MP in The Guardian under the title,
Scrap tuition fees? Yes we have
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/07/scrap-tuition-fees-we-have
I don’t think I need comment. The title says it all. Judging from the feedback, it would seem that not many people are buying it, either.
08 November 2010, 10:39 pm
Well said Sara. I agree completely. I am getting bit sick of various MPs trying to tell us that what to think.
08 November 2010, 10:53 pm
Its quite obvious that education isn’t free and never has been. What amazes me is that anyone could think otherwise.
The question is who should pay, and perhaps the question also ought to be what is worth buying anyway.
If you regard these questions as heresy then there really is no hope.